Tolerant laws allow spread of graffiti

IN MID-NOVEMBER 2008 you published a letter from me about the increasing prevalence of public graffiti.

My final sentence on the issue was: “if this is not nipped severely in the bud it is a social phenomenon which will bring expense, increasing ugliness, and a great regret for not acting sooner”.

Getting on for six years later we have seen this concern fully justified.

Recently a party of us visited the superb amphitheatre in Tala for a concert.

The place was despoiled by particularly mindless, irresponsible, and ugly blue graffiti with one contemptuous and brazen message reading: “we come at night”.

The Tala mukhtar believes she knows the perpetrators, but CCTV proof is needed. Painting over the ‘art’ is not an option on the stonework and it will be next to impossible to remove.

Nowadays, evidence of this activity in Cyprus is depressingly commonplace and I have yet to see a single report of anyone being found responsible. Is this an example of uncaring (or perhaps helpless) municipalities?

In Singapore, if people are caught, the punishment is caning, a heavy fine, and naming and shaming.

What a pity in some respects that our tolerant laws do not allow us to follow suit. Graffiti is a true blight and reflects so very badly on a Mediterranean island and community widely respected for its historical and artistic culture.

Clive Turner,
Paphos